What do we call a conclusion that has been drawn with the use of inductive reasoning?

A conclusion drawn through inductive reasoning is best referred to as a theory. Inductive reasoning involves observing specific examples or instances and deriving a general principle or conclusion from them. This means that rather than testing a hypothesis directly, inductive reasoning allows for the development of broader explanations or theories based on accumulated evidence and patterns.

For instance, after observing that the sun has risen every day, one might induce that the sun will rise again tomorrow. This conclusion, while grounded in repeated observations, can lead to a broader understanding or a theoretical framework about the nature of celestial bodies and their movements.

The other terms listed do not encapsulate the nature of conclusions reached through inductive reasoning in the same way. A fact refers to an observation that can be proven true through evidence, while a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that can be tested through experimentation. An assumption involves accepting something as true without evidence to support it. Hence, theory is the most accurate term representing a conclusion derived from inductive reasoning.