Which reasoning method starts with facts to draw general conclusions?

Inductive reasoning is a method that begins with specific observations or facts and uses them to develop broader generalizations or conclusions. In this process, one analyzes particular instances and derives patterns or principles that can apply more generally. For example, by observing that the sun rises in the east every day, one could conclude that the sun always rises in the east. This approach is foundational in scientific inquiry, as it allows researchers to formulate theories based on patterns they observe in experimental data or real-world phenomena.

In contrast, other methods, like deductive reasoning, start with a general statement or hypothesis and work towards specific conclusions based on that generalization. Empirical reasoning emphasizes evidence gathered from observation or experimentation, while hypothetical reasoning focuses on making predictions based on hypothetical scenarios rather than specific instances. Inductive reasoning is distinct because it emphasizes moving from particular data to general conclusions, making it a critical part of the scientific method.